Kelly v. Collins

City of New York Municipal Court

Kelly v. Collins

4 N.Y.S. 436, 18 N.Y. St. Rep. 316

DecidedOctober 15, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y.S. 436 (Kelly v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Collins, 4 N.Y.S. 436, 18 N.Y. St. Rep. 316 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Mo Ad am, C. J.

The effect of the order of interpleader was to merge the two actions into one in respect to subsequent procedure. It was too late to discontinue one of the original actions after it had become effectually merged into the other. In addition to this, the action could not be discontinued by the mere service of a notice. 'A rule for discontinuance should have been entered with the clerk, and the defendant’s costs paid or tendered. Averill v. Patterson, 10 N. Y. 500. Motion to set aside order of interpleader denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mo Ad am, C. J.

The effect of the order of interpleader was to merge the two actions into one in respect to subsequent procedure. It was too late to discontinue one of the original actions after it had become effectually merged into the other. In addition to this, the action could not be discontinued by the mere service of a notice. 'A rule for discontinuance should have been entered with the clerk, and the defendant’s costs paid or tendered. Averill v. Patterson, 10 N. Y. 500. Motion to set aside order of interpleader denied, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.Y.S. 436, 18 N.Y. St. Rep. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-collins-nynyccityct-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack