Kelly v. Chinich
107 A. 775, 90 N.J. Eq. 602, 5 Stock. 602, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 271
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelly v. Chinich. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 N.J. Eq. 97 →
Opinion
This case was marked to be submitted on briefs, and briefs came in on both sides. That for the appellants, however, is not signed by counsel, and cannot be considered. The case stands as though the appeal had not been moved, and respondents are consequently entitled to a decree of affirmance. Hazard v, Phœnix Woodworking Co., 78 N. J. Eq. 568.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER-13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. Chinich, 107 A. 775, 90 N.J. Eq. 602, 5 Stock. 602, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 271 (N.J. 1919).
107 A. 775 (Kelly v. Chinich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.