Kelly v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Kelly v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.

168 S.E. 510, 204 N.C. 784, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 280

DecidedMarch 29, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 510 (Kelly v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc., 168 S.E. 510, 204 N.C. 784, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 280 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought suit to collect an amount alleged to be due him as commissions for the sale of pianos under a contract he made with the defendant. When the pleadings were filed a compulsory reference was ordered and exceptions were filed to the report. An issue of debt was then submitted to the jury and was answered in favor of the plaintiff.

We have examined all the exceptions in the appellant’s brief and find no just cause for disturbing the judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought suit to collect an amount alleged to be due him as commissions for the sale of pianos under a contract he made with the defendant. When the pleadings were filed a compulsory reference was ordered and exceptions were filed to the report. An issue of debt was then submitted to the jury and was answered in favor of the plaintiff.

We have examined all the exceptions in the appellant’s brief and find no just cause for disturbing the judgment.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E. 510, 204 N.C. 784, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-chas-m-stieff-inc-nc-1933.