Kelly v. Braunschweig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly v. Braunschweig

247 A.D. 809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 809 (Kelly v. Braunschweig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Braunschweig, 247 A.D. 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant Kalkstein, sued with the owner of adjoining property for damages for personal injuries caused by negligence in maintaining sidewalks at the dividing line of the property at different grades, made default on the trial. Evidently this was due to bad advice and motives of economy, although she had appeared by an attorney and served an answer. The action was severed and on a trial the plaintiff had a verdict against the other defendant. Later, on an inquest, the plaintiff had judgment against this defendant. She later moved to open her default and the motion was granted on terms. Order opening her default affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant Kalkstein, sued with the owner of adjoining property for damages for personal injuries caused by negligence in maintaining sidewalks at the dividing line of the property at different grades, made default on the trial. Evidently this was due to bad advice and motives of economy, although she had appeared by an attorney and served an answer. The action was severed and on a trial the plaintiff had a verdict against the other defendant. Later, on an inquest, the plaintiff had judgment against this defendant. She later moved to open her default and the motion was granted on terms. Order opening her default affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-braunschweig-nyappdiv-1936.