Kelly v. Bloomingdale

19 N.Y.S. 126, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 370, 64 Hun 634
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 9, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 19 N.Y.S. 126 (Kelly v. Bloomingdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Bloomingdale, 19 N.Y.S. 126, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 370, 64 Hun 634 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Pratt, J.

The referee’s opinion is so full that no more discussion is required. We find no error, and the judgment should be affirmed. As both parties appeal, there should be no costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 N.Y.S. 126, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 370, 64 Hun 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-bloomingdale-nysupct-1892.