Kelly v. Blendinger

263 A.D. 1069, 34 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8094

This text of 263 A.D. 1069 (Kelly v. Blendinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Blendinger, 263 A.D. 1069, 34 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed.on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the finding that the defendant was negligent was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (Higgins v. Mason, 255 N. Y. 104; Helton v. Prater’s Adm’r., 272 Ky. 574; 114 S. W. [2d] 1120.) All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Dowling, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of the negligent condition of an automobile. The order denies defendant’s motion for a new trial.) Present— Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helton v. Prater's Adm'r
114 S.W.2d 1120 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Higgins v. Mason
174 N.E. 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 1069, 34 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-blendinger-nyappdiv-1942.