Kelly v. Bishop
This text of 678 F. App'x 96 (Kelly v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-03795-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2016). We deny Kelly’s motions to participate in oral argument, to reconsider, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[97]*97fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 F. App'x 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-bishop-ca4-2017.