Kelly & Sons v. Monroe Cotton Mills

118 S.E. 593, 30 Ga. App. 609, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 552
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1923
Docket14587
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 S.E. 593 (Kelly & Sons v. Monroe Cotton Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly & Sons v. Monroe Cotton Mills, 118 S.E. 593, 30 Ga. App. 609, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

A mortgage upon immature and growing agricultural crops, upon the authority of Farmers Warehouse Co. v. First National Bank of Milledgeville, 152 Ca. 262 (109 S. E. 900), in order to be entitled to record, must have been attested by two witnesses, one of whom is an official witness. The question to be determined in the present case is controlled by the principle announced in that case, and the cases there cited. The mortgage here dealt with having been executed prior to the act of 1922 (Ga. L. 1922, pp. 114, 115), which declared growing crops to be personalty, so that mortgages upon them .could be taken as chattel mortgages, the court properly directed a verdict in favor of Monroe Cotton Mills. It follows that it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial by Kelly & Sons.

Judgment affirmed on the main hill of exceptions; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.

Broyles, C. •/.. and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whatley v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.
120 S.E. 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 593, 30 Ga. App. 609, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-sons-v-monroe-cotton-mills-gactapp-1923.