Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc.

537 F. App'x 908
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 18, 2013·No. 12-14346·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises from Appellants’ complaint alleging violations of the minimum wage, overtime, and retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. On March 30, 2011, the district court granted the Appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment on the minimum wage and retaliation claims, *909 and this appeal followed. 1 After carefully reviewing both parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the partial grant of summary judgment entered against the Appellants for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned order entered by the district court on March 30, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

1

. After the order granting partial summary judgment, a jury returned a verdict for Appellees on Appellant's overtime claims. Although Appellants' Notice of Appeal purports to challenge that verdict, their brief makes no

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc., 537 F. App'x 908 (11th Cir. 2013).

537 F. App'x 908 (Kelly Philips v. M.I. Quality Lawn Maintenance, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sims v. Unation, LLC
292 F. Supp. 3d 1286 (M.D. Florida, 2018)