Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals
This text of Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals (Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-23-00162-CV
KELLY LEE DICKEY, Appellant v.
BRYAN COLLIER, LORIE DAVIS, KELLY L. STRONG, CHRISTOPHER S. LACOX, CANDIS M. WELLS, LESLIE L. THOMPSON, JACOB M. WOLF, DANIELLE N. SLIDER, TWO UNNAMED INDIVIDUALS, Appellees
From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 2029653
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kelly Lee Dickey attempts to appeal the trial court’s judgment rendered on,
according to Dickey’s notice of appeal, December 29, 2022. By letter dated June 6, 2023,
the Clerk of this Court notified Dickey that the appeal was subject to dismissal because
the notice of appeal was untimely. In the same letter, the Clerk warned Dickey that the
appeal would be dismissed unless, within 14 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing that the notice of appeal was timely filed. More than 14 days have
passed and no response has been filed.
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.
P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP.
P. 5; TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; § 51.941(a). Under these circumstances, we
suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX.
R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way
eliminates or reduces the fees owed.
This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 44.3.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 5, 2023 [CV06]
Dickey v. Collier, et al. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-lee-dickey-v-bryan-collier-lorie-davis-kelly-l-strong-texapp-2023.