Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 5, 2023
Docket10-23-00162-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals (Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00162-CV

KELLY LEE DICKEY, Appellant v.

BRYAN COLLIER, LORIE DAVIS, KELLY L. STRONG, CHRISTOPHER S. LACOX, CANDIS M. WELLS, LESLIE L. THOMPSON, JACOB M. WOLF, DANIELLE N. SLIDER, TWO UNNAMED INDIVIDUALS, Appellees

From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 2029653

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kelly Lee Dickey attempts to appeal the trial court’s judgment rendered on,

according to Dickey’s notice of appeal, December 29, 2022. By letter dated June 6, 2023,

the Clerk of this Court notified Dickey that the appeal was subject to dismissal because

the notice of appeal was untimely. In the same letter, the Clerk warned Dickey that the

appeal would be dismissed unless, within 14 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing that the notice of appeal was timely filed. More than 14 days have

passed and no response has been filed.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP.

P. 5; TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; § 51.941(a). Under these circumstances, we

suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX.

R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way

eliminates or reduces the fees owed.

This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 44.3.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 5, 2023 [CV06]

Dickey v. Collier, et al. Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 51.207
Texas GV § 51.207(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kelly Lee Dickey v. Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Kelly L. Strong, Christopher S. Lacox, Candis M. Wells, Leslie L. Thompson, Jacob M. Wolf, Danielle N. Slider, Two Unnamed Individuals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-lee-dickey-v-bryan-collier-lorie-davis-kelly-l-strong-texapp-2023.