Kelly Kim v. Coleman
This text of 56 A.D.2d 259 (Kelly Kim v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 16, 2008, which, in an action for medical malpractice, granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint to the extent of ordering a traverse hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A traverse hearing was properly ordered in light of the conflicting accounts provided by plaintiffs process server, and [260]*260defendant and his office manager, regarding how and whether service was properly effectuated upon defendant (see Ananda Capital Partners v Stav Elec. Sys. [1994], 301 AD2d 430 [2003]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Gonzalez, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 259, 866 N.Y.S.2d 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-kim-v-coleman-nyappdiv-2008.