Kelly Kim v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly Kim v. Coleman

56 A.D.2d 259, 866 N.Y.S.2d 570

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 2008·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 16, 2008, which, in an action for medical malpractice, granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint to the extent of ordering a traverse hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A traverse hearing was properly ordered in light of the conflicting accounts provided by plaintiffs process server, and [260]*260defendant and his office manager, regarding how and whether service was properly effectuated upon defendant (see Ananda Capital Partners v Stav Elec. Sys. [1994], 301 AD2d 430 [2003]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Gonzalez, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 16, 2008, which, in an action for medical malpractice, granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint to the extent of ordering a traverse hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A traverse hearing was properly ordered in light of the conflicting accounts provided by plaintiffs process server, and [260]*260defendant and his office manager, regarding how and whether service was properly effectuated upon defendant (see Ananda Capital Partners v Stav Elec. Sys. [1994], 301 AD2d 430 [2003]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Gonzalez, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Kelly Kim v. Coleman, 56 A.D.2d 259, 866 N.Y.S.2d 570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

56 A.D.2d 259 (Kelly Kim v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related