KELLY, JOHN, PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 29, 2012
DocketKA 09-02177
StatusPublished

This text of KELLY, JOHN, PEOPLE v (KELLY, JOHN, PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KELLY, JOHN, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

818 KA 09-02177 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN KELLY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (CHRISTINE M. COOK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a resentence of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered October 1, 2009. Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the original sentence is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence pursuant to which, following a hearing, County Court sentenced him to a five-year period of postrelease supervision. As the People correctly concede, the court erred in imposing a period of postrelease supervision after defendant had been conditionally released from the previously imposed determinate sentence of incarceration. Inasmuch as he had been released from custody, defendant had “a legitimate expectation that the sentence, although illegal under the Penal Law, [was] final and the Double Jeopardy Clause prevents a court from modifying the sentence to include a period of postrelease supervision” (People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 219-220, cert denied ___ US ___, 131 S Ct 125; see People v Viehdeffer, 75 AD3d 1112, 1113).

Entered: June 29, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
925 N.E.2d 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Viehdeffer
75 A.D.3d 1112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
KELLY, JOHN, PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-john-people-v-nyappdiv-2012.