Kelly Asphalt Block Co. v. Brooklyn Alcatraz Asphalt Co.

191 A.D. 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Upon reargument, it appears that readjustment and allowance of interest charges between the parties in conformity with the decision of this court show that there was no money due plaintiff from defendant. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs to the appellant, and judgment unanimously directed dismissing the complaint upon the merits, with costs, with appropriate reversal and modification of the findings made by the referee and new findings by this court in accordance with its decision of February 27, 1920, and opinion filed. [See 190 App. Div. 750.] Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur. Settle order upon notice. [See ante, p. 915.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly Asphalt Block Co. v. Brooklyn Alcatraz Asphalt Co., 191 A.D. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

191 A.D. 922 (Kelly Asphalt Block Co. v. Brooklyn Alcatraz Asphalt Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Telsey v. Jabil Realty Co.
283 A.D. 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
J. C. F. Holding Corp. v. General Gas & Electric Corp.
181 Misc. 283 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)