Kellow v. Tillamook County Creamery

921 P.2d 996, 143 Or. App. 311, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1325
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 28, 1996·No. WCB No. 93-09427; CA A85578·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding insurer’s denial of benefits for her carpal tunnel syndrome. The issue presented concerns whether ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) is applicable here and, if so, how it is properly applied in this case. Because that statute was amended by the 1995 legislature and the amended version may be applicable here, we remand the case to the Board to consider the applicability of the amended statute. Conner v. Connecticut Indemnity Co., 139 Or App 421, 912 P2d 413 (1996); Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995), rev den 322 Or 645 (1996).

Remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kellow v. Tillamook County Creamery, 921 P.2d 996, 143 Or. App. 311, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1325 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

921 P.2d 996 (Kellow v. Tillamook County Creamery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conner v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.
912 P.2d 413 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Volk v. America West Airlines
899 P.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)