Kellow v. Rose

Supreme Court of Florida

Kellow v. Rose

21 So. 2d 788, 155 Fla. 823, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 666

DecidedApril 20, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 21 So. 2d 788 (Kellow v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kellow v. Rose, 21 So. 2d 788, 155 Fla. 823, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 666 (Fla. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff recovered a verdict in an action wherein one Claude Cox was alleged to be the agent of the appellee, Rose and Horne, and while in the course of such agency inflicted injury to plaintiff by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle.

The verdict was set aside and a new trial awarded because the evidence was insufficient to prove the agency.

From our study of the record we are unable to say the trial court abused its discretion so the judgment is affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff recovered a verdict in an action wherein one Claude Cox was alleged to be the agent of the appellee, Rose and Horne, and while in the course of such agency inflicted injury to plaintiff by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle.

The verdict was set aside and a new trial awarded because the evidence was insufficient to prove the agency.

From our study of the record we are unable to say the trial court abused its discretion so the judgment is affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 So. 2d 788, 155 Fla. 823, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellow-v-rose-fla-1945.