Kellogg v. Williams
1 Kirby 316
This text of 1 Kirby 316 (Kellogg v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kellogg v. Williams, 1 Kirby 316 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).
Opinion
The casé is — That Mr. Hosmer bad tbe executions, not merely as an attorney, but as an assignee, [317]*317to discount the avails upon his demand against Kellogg; and had, therefore, a property o. interest in the executions, which came to his administrativand validated the settlement with her, as to all persons concerned.
The motion was, therefore, ruled insufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Kirby 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellogg-v-williams-connsuperct-1787.