Kellogg v. Williams

1 Kirby 316

Opinion

By the Court.

The casé is — That Mr. Hosmer bad tbe executions, not merely as an attorney, but as an assignee, to discount the avails upon his demand against Kellogg; and had, therefore, a property o. interest in the executions, which came to his administrativand validated the settlement with her, as to all persons concerned.

The motion was, therefore, ruled insufficient.