Kellogg v. Nike, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Kellogg v. Nike, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 2011

Docket2010-1173

StatusUnpublished

This text of Kellogg v. Nike, Inc. (Kellogg v. Nike, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kellogg v. Nike, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit GERALD A. KELLOGG, Plaintiff-Appellan.t, V. NIKE, INC. AND NIKE USA, INC., Defendan.ts-Cross Appellants. ' 2010-1173, -1174, -1195, -1196 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in case no. 07-CV-0070, Chief Judge Joseph F. Batai1lon. ON MOTION ORDER Gera1d A. Ke11ogg moves to strike portions of Nike, Inc. and Nike USA, Inc.’S (Nike) reply brief Nike opposes Kellogg replies Upon consideration thereof IT IS ORDERED THATZ

KELLOGG V. NIIE 2 The motion is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to hear this case. Copies of this order, the motion, the response, and the reply shall be transmitted to the merits panel FoR THE CoURT EEB 1 7 gun 131 Jan H0rba1y Date Jan I'Iorbaly Clerk - cc: Mark J. Peterson, Esq. B. Trent Webb, Esq. s2O F|LED u.s. count or APPEALs son mr renew cream FEB 17 2011 JAN |t0RBALY CLEH£

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit GERALD A. KELLOGG, Plaintiff-Appellan.t, V. NIKE, INC. AND NIKE USA, INC., Defendan.ts-Cross Appellants. ' 2010-1173, -1174, -1195, -1196 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in case no. 07-CV-0070, Chief Judge Joseph F. Batai1lon. ON MOTION ORDER Gera1d A. Ke11ogg moves to strike portions of Nike, Inc. and Nike USA, Inc.’S (Nike) reply brief Nike opposes Kellogg replies Upon consideration thereof IT IS ORDERED THATZ

KELLOGG V. NIIE 2 The motion is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to hear this case. Copies of this order, the motion, the response, and the reply shall be transmitted to the merits panel FoR THE CoURT EEB 1 7 gun 131 Jan H0rba1y Date Jan I'Iorbaly Clerk - cc: Mark J. Peterson, Esq. B. Trent Webb, Esq. s2O F|LED u.s. count or APPEALs son mr renew cream FEB 17 2011 JAN |t0RBALY CLEH£

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kellogg v. Nike, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellogg-v-nike-inc-cafc-2011.