Kellogg v. King
245 U.S. 626, 38 S. Ct. 12
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Telluride Power & Transmission Co. v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co., 175 U. S. 639; First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341; (2) Choteau v. Gibson, 111 U. S. 200; San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65; Wood v. Chesbrough, 228 U. S. 672.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kellogg v. King, 245 U.S. 626, 38 S. Ct. 12 (1917).
245 U.S. 626 (Kellogg v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gardner v. Best Western International, Inc.
929 S.W.2d 474 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
In Re Riding
44 B.R. 846 (D. Utah, 1984)
R. H. Fulton v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad Company
481 F.2d 326 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
Fulton v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
481 F.2d 326 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
In re Miracle Mart, Inc.
293 F. Supp. 417 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Edward Gordon v. United States
358 F.2d 112 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
Teeters v. Pennsylvania R.
118 F. Supp. 385 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1954)
Clark v. United States
208 F.2d 840 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)
Mitchell v. United States
126 F.2d 550 (Tenth Circuit, 1942)
United States v. Ames
39 F. Supp. 885 (S.D. New York, 1941)