Kellogg v. Groves
This text of 5 N.W. 517 (Kellogg v. Groves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contention of appellants is that by holding over they became tenants at will, and were entitled to thirty days notice [396]*396to quit. Section 2014 of the Code provides that any person in the possession of real property, with the assent of the owner, is presumed to be a tenant at will until the contrary is shown; and under section 2015 thirty .days notice in writing is necessary to be given to terminate a tenancy at will. But the same section provides that where an express agreement is made the tenancy shall cease at the time agreed upon, without notice. By the terms of the written lease the defendants’ tenancy was to cease on December 1, 1878; after that time there was no tenancy, at will or otherwise. The defendants were lessees holding over, and entitled to the three days notice to quit, as provided in Code, § 3611. Grosvener v. Henry, 27 Iowa, 269.
What the rights of defendants would have been, if plaintiff liad permitted them to remain without notice to quit until they had made preparations for planting crops, we need not determine, as no such case is presented in the record.
Appirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.W. 517, 53 Iowa 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellogg-v-groves-iowa-1880.