Kellogg v. Graham

Ohio Supreme Court

Kellogg v. Graham

1 Wright 87, 1 Ohio Ch. 87

DecidedAugust 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 87 (Kellogg v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kellogg v. Graham, 1 Wright 87, 1 Ohio Ch. 87 (Ohio 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

A retaxation is ordered, and the clerk is directed to strike the $23.20, ordered to be paid by defendant, out of the bill; it was improperly included in it, and the plaintiff having paid it, will have a right to recover it back again.

Where costs are taxed in the progress of a cause, and ordered to be paid, they may be collected by process of attachment — not by judgment and execution, at the will of the clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

A retaxation is ordered, and the clerk is directed to strike the $23.20, ordered to be paid by defendant, out of the bill; it was improperly included in it, and the plaintiff having paid it, will have a right to recover it back again.

Where costs are taxed in the progress of a cause, and ordered to be paid, they may be collected by process of attachment — not by judgment and execution, at the will of the clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 87, 1 Ohio Ch. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellogg-v-graham-ohio-1832.