Kellogg v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kellogg v. City of Chicago

176 Ill. App. 136, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 41

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 30, 1912

DocketGen. No. 16,661

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ill. App. 136 (Kellogg v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kellogg v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. App. 136, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 41 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error began a case of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant in error to recover the sum of $64.84 and interest thereon claimed to be due him as rebate on a special assessment. The cause was submitted to the court without a jury. The court found for the defendant and entered judgment thereon, and the plaintiff sued out this writ of error.

There is in the record neither a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial nor a correct statement of facts by the trial judge, as required by the Municipal Court Act. What purports to he a correct statement of facts is manifestly not a statement of the facts by the judge as required by the law, but merely a statement that a witness gave testimony in relation to certain things.

The record disclosing no reversible error, the judg- • ment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI