Kellogg v. Barnes

Michigan Court of Chancery

Kellogg v. Barnes

1 Harr. Ch. 258

DecidedJuly 1, 1840

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Harr. Ch. 258 (Kellogg v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kellogg v. Barnes, 1 Harr. Ch. 258 (Mich. Ct. App. 1840).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

Where a part after service of notice of retainer, neglected to appear and oppose, the court say, by not appearing, the party consents to the application. Ekhart vs. Dearman, 2 Caines’ Rep., 3791 Such, also, appears to be tho practice in England.

The defendant may take the order that the injunction be dissolved with costs, stating in the order, however, that no one appeared on the motion to oppose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

Where a part after service of notice of retainer, neglected to appear and oppose, the court say, by not appearing, the party consents to the application. Ekhart vs. Dearman, 2 Caines’ Rep., 3791 Such, also, appears to be tho practice in England.

The defendant may take the order that the injunction be dissolved with costs, stating in the order, however, that no one appeared on the motion to oppose.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Harr. Ch. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellogg-v-barnes-michchanct-1840.