Kellin Milburn Klein v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 7, 2025
Docket5D2024-0935
StatusPublished

This text of Kellin Milburn Klein v. State of Florida (Kellin Milburn Klein v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kellin Milburn Klein v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-0935 LT Case No. 2019-CF-9594-A _____________________________

KELLIN MILBURN KLEIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. London M. Kite, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ryan Roy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

March 7, 2025

PRATT, J.

Having found no reversible error apparent on the face of the record, we affirm this Anders * appeal. In particular, we conclude that competent, substantial evidence supported the trial court’s

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). determination that Appellant willfully and substantially violated conditions of his probation, see Knight v. State, 187 So. 3d 307, 310 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), and the trial court did not err in revoking Appellant’s probation and sentencing him to fifteen years in prison. However, we remand for the trial court to correct its written “Order Revoking Probation.” At the conclusion of the violation of probation hearing, the court found that Appellant had violated condition five and special condition sixteen but had not violated condition two and special condition six. The written order, however, stated that Appellant violated all four conditions. The oral pronouncement controls, and we will remand for the trial court to conform the written order to its oral pronouncement. See Hardy v. State, 301 So. 3d 1127, 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Davel K. Knight v. State
187 So. 3d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kellin Milburn Klein v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellin-milburn-klein-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.