Kelley v. Wooden Toy Manufacturers

825 P.2d 294, 111 Or. App. 635, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 401
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 26, 1992
Docket89-01778; CA A66593
StatusPublished

This text of 825 P.2d 294 (Kelley v. Wooden Toy Manufacturers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley v. Wooden Toy Manufacturers, 825 P.2d 294, 111 Or. App. 635, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 401 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer concedes that this case should be remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for redeter-mination of whether claimant’s attorney is entitled to an insurer-paid attorney fee under ORS 656.386(1). We accept the concession. Jones v. OSCI, 108 Or App 230, 814 P2d 558 (1991).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
814 P.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 P.2d 294, 111 Or. App. 635, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-wooden-toy-manufacturers-orctapp-1992.