Kelley v. Whitaker
This text of 211 S.E.2d 176 (Kelley v. Whitaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Appellant’s sole enumeration of error "is not argued, or supported by citation of authority in the brief, and there was no oral argument in this case; therefore, it is deemed to have been abandoned. Andrew v. State, 229 Ga. 388, 389 (191 SE2d 841); Ezzard v. State, 229 Ga. 465 (1) (192 SE2d 374).” Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga. App. 651, 655 (5) (206 SE2d 585).
2. "There being no 'judgment for a sum certain, which has been affirmed’ (Code § 6-1801), the motion for the assessment of damages under said Code section is hereby denied.” Wright v. Collins, 117 Ga. App. 105, 106 (2) (159 SE2d 468).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 S.E.2d 176, 133 Ga. App. 229, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-whitaker-gactapp-1974.