Kelley v. State

120 S.W. 877, 56 Tex. Crim. 516, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 Tex. Crim. 507
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 19, 1909·No. No. 4258.·Published

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft, and his punishment assessed at ninety days imprisonment in the county jail.

Appellant insists that the information and complaint are defective in this: Same charged the theft of the alleged stolen property to have been made from the possession of Clarence D. Pratt, while the proof shows that said stolen property, if stolen at all, was owned by the Lincoln Paint and Color Company. The evidence shows that said Pratt had the control, care and management of the property of the company. The evidence supports the verdict, and the proof and allegation entirely correspond. These are the only questions raised in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelley v. State, 120 S.W. 877, 56 Tex. Crim. 516, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 305 (Tex. 1909).

120 S.W. 877 (Kelley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.