Kelley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kelley v. State

281 S.W.3d 922, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 538, 2009 WL 1119601

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 2009·No. ED 91399·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Kelley appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not cleai’ly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Kelley appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not cleai’ly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Kelley v. State, 281 S.W.3d 922, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 538, 2009 WL 1119601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

281 S.W.3d 922 (Kelley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.