Kelley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kelley v. State

149 S.E. 921, 40 Ga. App. 444, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 188

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 8, 1929

Docket19858

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 921 (Kelley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelley v. State, 149 S.E. 921, 40 Ga. App. 444, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of evidence fail to state what objection was made to the evidence at the time it was offered, and fail to state on what ground the subsequent motion to exclude the evidence was based. Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, these grounds are too defective to be considered.

2. There is evidence to support the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a. new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of evidence fail to state what objection was made to the evidence at the time it was offered, and fail to state on what ground the subsequent motion to exclude the evidence was based. Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, these grounds are too defective to be considered.

2. There is evidence to support the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a. new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 921, 40 Ga. App. 444, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-state-gactapp-1929.