Kelley v. State

445 So. 2d 701, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1169
StatusPublished

This text of 445 So. 2d 701 (Kelley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley v. State, 445 So. 2d 701, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not admitting the proffered testimony which would have been cumulative. See Sheppard v. State, 322 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Smith v. State, 320 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
320 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Sheppard v. State
322 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 So. 2d 701, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.