Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kelley v. State

Kelley v. State

445 So. 2d 701, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 1984·No. No. 83-1169·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not admitting the proffered testimony which would have been cumulative. See Sheppard v. State, 322 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Smith v. State, 320 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelley v. State, 445 So. 2d 701, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

445 So. 2d 701 (Kelley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
320 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Sheppard v. State
322 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)