Kelley v. Sakai

127 P. 107, 70 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1111
Washington Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1912·No. No. 10802·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss the appeal on account of the alleged insufficiency of the bond is denied; it appearing to the court that the bond is sufficient as an appeal bond, and as a supersedeas to stay tbe costs in the judgment appealed from, which said judgment was entered in the superior court of the state of Washington for King county on the 25th day of May, 1912. Further than this, the bond is without legal effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelley v. Sakai, 127 P. 107, 70 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1111 (Wash. 1912).

127 P. 107 (Kelley v. Sakai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wall v. Woods
234 P. 145 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)
Michaels v. Levinson
144 P. 903 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)