Kelley v. SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER

268 S.W.3d 434, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1265, 2008 WL 4210464
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2008·No. ED 91075·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Saint Francis Medical Center and Zurich American Insurance Company (hereinafter and collectively, “Employer”) appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (hereinafter, “the Commission”) which adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge, finding Tina Kelley (hereinafter, “Employee”) suffered a compensable injury to her wrists. Employer raises two points on appeal, claiming the Commission erred in awarding Employee benefits due to a prior settlement agreement and Employee failed to prove her job activities were a substantial factor in causing her injuries.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelley v. SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, 268 S.W.3d 434, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1265, 2008 WL 4210464 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

268 S.W.3d 434 (Kelley v. SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thurman v. ST. ANDREWS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
268 S.W.3d 434 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)