Kelley v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Kelley v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 2010

Docket2009-3250

StatusUnpublished

This text of Kelley v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Kelley v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelley v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit 2009-325O TlNA M. KELLEY (now known as Tina M. Dequin), Petitioner, v. MER|T SYSTEMS PROTECT|ON BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in CH0752090405-l-1. ON MOTlON 0 R D E R Upon consideration of the Department of Veterans Affaiis' motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent |T lS 0RDERED THAT: - (1) The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The Merit Systems Protection Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT lsi Jan_HQrb3ly______gj__j_g_ nw Date _ Jan Horbaly C|erk cc: Tina M. Dequin Kenneth D. Woodrow, Esq. ` fit EB Michael Carney, Esq. (copy of petitioner's informal brief enc|osed) u'Sfl?lgtr§Y'E\i_Pc§1'i§Ac'us\TF°R 38 FEB 26 2010 lAN HORBALY CI.ERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit 2009-325O TlNA M. KELLEY (now known as Tina M. Dequin), Petitioner, v. MER|T SYSTEMS PROTECT|ON BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in CH0752090405-l-1. ON MOTlON 0 R D E R Upon consideration of the Department of Veterans Affaiis' motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent |T lS 0RDERED THAT: - (1) The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The Merit Systems Protection Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT lsi Jan_HQrb3ly______gj__j_g_ nw Date _ Jan Horbaly C|erk cc: Tina M. Dequin Kenneth D. Woodrow, Esq. ` fit EB Michael Carney, Esq. (copy of petitioner's informal brief enc|osed) u'Sfl?lgtr§Y'E\i_Pc§1'i§Ac'us\TF°R 38 FEB 26 2010 lAN HORBALY CI.ERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kelley v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2010.