Kelley v. Kelley

25 Pa. 460
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 25 Pa. 460 (Kelley v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley v. Kelley, 25 Pa. 460 (Pa. 1855).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

The will under which the plaintiff claims contains all the unimportant phrases of the form book, without a single intelligible devise or bequest. Such a will is insensible and void. It is incapable of being interpreted or executed. The [463]*463parol evidence that was offered, and properly rejected, might have made a will for the testator, but could have given no vitality to this senseless and shapeless instrument.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frazier v. Fabrick
46 Pa. D. & C.3d 105 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1987)
Good Estate
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 14 (Clinton County Orphans' Court, 1963)
Beisgen Estate
128 A.2d 52 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Wise's Estate
60 Pa. D. & C. 243 (Perry County Orphans' Court, 1947)
McKean Estate
48 A.2d 74 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Carlin's Estate
36 Pa. D. & C. 702 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Pa. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-kelley-pa-1855.