Kelley v. Kelley

83 S.E. 856, 142 Ga. 861, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 575
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 18, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 83 S.E. 856 (Kelley v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley v. Kelley, 83 S.E. 856, 142 Ga. 861, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 575 (Ga. 1914).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Mere general averments in a motion for new trial, that the court erred in admitting evidence, and that the charge of the court was erroneous, are not sufficiently definite to he the basis of valid assignments of error.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

AW the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Irwin v. Young
87 S.E.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
City of Manchester v. Beavers
144 S.E. 11 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Legg v. Legg
140 S.E. 868 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 856, 142 Ga. 861, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-kelley-ga-1914.