Kelley v. Kelley
83 S.E. 856, 142 Ga. 861, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 575
Opinion
1. Mere general averments in a motion for new trial, that the court erred in admitting evidence, and that the charge of the court was erroneous, are not sufficiently definite to he the basis of valid assignments of error.
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelley v. Kelley, 83 S.E. 856, 142 Ga. 861, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 575 (Ga. 1914).
83 S.E. 856 (Kelley v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irwin v. Young
87 S.E.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
City of Manchester v. Beavers
144 S.E. 11 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Legg v. Legg
140 S.E. 868 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)