Kelley v. Centennial Bank (In Re Kelley)

536 F. App'x 675
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 31, 2013
Docket13-1491
StatusUnpublished

This text of 536 F. App'x 675 (Kelley v. Centennial Bank (In Re Kelley)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley v. Centennial Bank (In Re Kelley), 536 F. App'x 675 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond and Karen Kelley (the Kel-leys) appeal the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 order requiring the Kel-leys to convey certain parcels of real property to Centennial Bank, pursuant to the Kelleys’ confirmed plan. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we agree with the BAP’s conclusions and find no basis to set aside the bankruptcy court’s order. See In re Ungar, 633 F.3d 675, 678-79 (8th Cir.2011) (this court applies same standards as BAP, reviewing bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error, and its legal determinations de novo); In re Dial Bus. Forms, Inc., 341 F.3d 738, 744 (8th Cir.2003) (bankruptcy court’s interpretation of confirmed plan is reviewed for abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Audrey R. Evans, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-centennial-bank-in-re-kelley-ca8-2013.