Kelley v. Brown
This text of 71 Mass. 108 (Kelley v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The paper in question was declared on as a common draft on a bank, with no averment that it bore any other character, or that from any peculiarity in its terms, attended with any known custom, it was understood to be a due bill, or evidence of money lent. There was no sufficient ground ¿herefore to warrant the admission of parol evidence. As a draft, the drawer was not liable without presentment to the drawee and dishonor by him. Chit. Bills, (10th Amer. ed.) 354, 389.
The defendant’s promise to pay the draft, without knowing that it had not been presented, was not binding on him. Garland v. Salem Bank, 9 Mass. 408.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Mass. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-brown-mass-1855.