Kelley v. Bennell

120 A. 26, 98 N.J.L. 565, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 253
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 5, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 120 A. 26 (Kelley v. Bennell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley v. Bennell, 120 A. 26, 98 N.J.L. 565, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 253 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Kelley was convicted by a police justice of violating an ordinance of Morristown to license and regulate jitneys. On certiorari to the Supreme Court the conviction was affirmed by an opinion per curiam. The state of the case does not disclose any judgment in the Supreme Court, nor any ground of appeal alleging that that court erred in the judgment which it rendered. In this situation there is nothing before this court for review. See State v. Belkota, 95 N. J. L. 416; Dia. Mills Paper Co. v. Leonard Hygiene Ice Co., Id. 540, 543. Either defect is fatal.

Let the appeal be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A. 26, 98 N.J.L. 565, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-bennell-nj-1923.