Kelley-Ross & Associates Inc v. Express Scripts Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 13, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00148·Unknown

Opinion

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON KELLEY-ROSS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, C22-0148 TSZ v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., Defendant. The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to compel, docket no. 40, is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff’s requested discovery is reasonably tailored to the subject matter of the litigation, reasonably constrained as they only ask for documents and responses relevant on or after to January 1, 2018, and their requested discovery is not overly broad. See Garneau v. City of Seattle, 147 F.3d 802, 812 (9th Cir. 1998); see also V5 Techs. v. Switch, Ltd., 334 F.R.D. 306, 309 (D. Nev. 2019). At the very least, Plaintiff’s discovery requests are reasonably likely to lead to relevant information. Taylor v. Kuerston, 598 F. Supp. 3d 874, 878 (E.D. Cal. 2022) (2) Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s respective motion for sanctions, docket nos. 40, 44, are DENIED. The Court is not persuaded that either party’s behavior warrants sanctions. (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. Dated this 13th day of March, 2023. Ravi Subramanian Clerk s/Laurie Cuaresma Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelley-Ross & Associates Inc v. Express Scripts Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Kelley-Ross & Associates Inc v. Express Scripts Inc (Kelley-Ross & Associates Inc v. Express Scripts Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garneau v. City of Seattle
147 F.3d 802 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)