Kelley, James

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 5, 2015
DocketWR-82,613-01
StatusPublished

This text of Kelley, James (Kelley, James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelley, James, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Case No: WR-82. 613-01 & WR-82.613-02

Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Texas 78711

I, James L. Kellev TDC3# 1894193 hereby gives notice to the clerk of court within the above mention cases are open &/or pending of the following change of prison confinement location

From August.15, 2014 until December 29, 2014, I was temporary released to the-city, of Kansas City, KS Wyandotte County Jail.

I'm currently back in Texas and currently housed in the TDCJ

Byrd Unit 21 FM 247 Huntsville, TX 777320

Effective December 30, 2014.

£.y.6C£iAe- [>sqsusp6L ?q' yy ^05 2015 TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Case # WR-82, 613-01 & WR-82,613-02

PETITION

FACTS

1. Mr. James Kelley did not waive court reporter at sentencing - Documented State records confirm above FACT as follows: > Both plea agreements - F09-72634/F09-59178 > State Opinion - 2013 Tex. App. Lexis 985*3 > Court of Appeals- 05.11.00842CR& 05.11.00843CR

Violates the VI & XIV Constitutional Amendments

2. NO COUNSEL at sentencing & NO COUNSELS SIGNATURE FOR CASE # F09-72634 on Plea Agreement or Right to Appeal a. Fraudulent court records www.dallascounty.org

3. CERTIFICATE OF THUMBPRINT FRADULENT FOR CASE# F09-72634 (COPIED FROM CASE # F09-59178) proves sentencing. a. Identity Theft by courts www.dallascounty.org

Violation of Federal Crime Act 1958 Section 83A By the 282nd District Court off Dallas

JUSTICE AND ASSISTANCE NEEDED

The 3 facts above sums up the complaint in the writ in a nutshell, take a look online at documents submitted & signed by the court. (Proof is in the documents) If the tables were turn & the petitioner submitted fraudulent documents to the courts then the petitioner would be punished but when the courts submitted fraudulent documents its swept under the rug so the speak. No court reporter, (every court proceeding/sentencing should have a court reporter) so it's hearsay but the documents speak for themselves, Petitioner has served his time for crime he's guilty of. This violation of his constitutional amendments, not only have cause harm to the petitioner but also his family. Justice (the truth) needs to come to light.

www.dallascounty.org Habeas Corpus 11.07 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Case#F09-59178/F09-72634 or W09-59178A / W09-72634A U.S. District Courts Northern District of Texas (Dallas) - Civil Case #: 3:14-cv-02984-D-BH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kelley, James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-james-texapp-2015.