Keller v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Keller v. State

33 So. 2d 386, 33 Ala. App. 355

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 14, 1948

Docket6 Div. 605.

StatusPublished

This text of 33 So. 2d 386 (Keller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keller v. State, 33 So. 2d 386, 33 Ala. App. 355 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

In this case an appeal was taken from the order and judgment made and entered by the Honorable Alta L. King, one of the judges of the Tenth Judicial Circuit wherein bail was disallowed and petitioner remanded to jail.

The petitioner is under indictment charged with robbery which upon conviction may be punished by death.

It would serve no good purpose to recite the evidence and we refrain from so doing.

This court has carefully and attentively considered the entire record, and a majority of the court have reached the conclusion that the order and judgment from which this appeal was taken be affirmed. To this, I am unable to accord, being prompted in so doing by the long established and oft-announced rule which need not be here reiterated. Said rule governing the point of decision involved in my opinion, is not applicable to the case at bar under the evidence contained in the record. The case, as stated, must be affirmed, to which I hereby enter my dissent.

Affirmed.

BRICKEN, P.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

In this case an appeal was taken from the order and judgment made and entered by the Honorable Alta L. King, one of the judges of the Tenth Judicial Circuit wherein bail was disallowed and petitioner remanded to jail.

The petitioner is under indictment charged with robbery which upon conviction may be punished by death.

It would serve no good purpose to recite the evidence and we refrain from so doing.

This court has carefully and attentively considered the entire record, and a majority of the court have reached the conclusion that the order and judgment from which this appeal was taken be affirmed. To this, I am unable to accord, being prompted in so doing by the long established and oft-announced rule which need not be here reiterated. Said rule governing the point of decision involved in my opinion, is not applicable to the case at bar under the evidence contained in the record. The case, as stated, must be affirmed, to which I hereby enter my dissent.

Affirmed.

BRICKEN, P.J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 So. 2d 386, 33 Ala. App. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-state-alactapp-1948.