Keller v. Southern Colonization Co.
This text of 181 N.W. 208 (Keller v. Southern Colonization Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in this case and in Fletcher v. Southern Colonization Company, supra, page 143, 181 N. W. 205, are similar in all respects, with the exception that the complaint in the present case alleges that the final payment on the contract for the purchase of the land was made September 4,1918. That was after Christofferson’s appointment and resignation and after defendant’s withdrawal from this state. This fact does not remove this case from the application of the principles stated in the Fletcher case. The contract was made and breached and the cause of action accrued prior to the date of Christofferson’s appointment. These were the vital facts which led to the conclusion expressed in the other case.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 N.W. 208, 148 Minn. 478, 1921 Minn. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-southern-colonization-co-minn-1921.