Keller v. Papavram
This text of 191 A.D.2d 1043 (Keller v. Papavram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court improperly granted summary judgment to plaintiff on her first cause of action for damages for personal injuries caused by negligence. The evidence submitted by plaintiff in support of the motion does not establish, as a matter of law, that, in causing injuries to plaintiff, defendant acted negligently rather than intentionally. Evidence that defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the third degree under Penal Law § 120.00 does not prove that he acted negligently. A person is guilty of assault in the third degree under subdivision (1) of Penal Law § 120.00 when, ”[w]ith intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person.” Under subdivision (2) of that section, he "is guilty of assault in the third degree when * * * [h]e recklessly causes physical injury to another person.” Because the record does not show under which subdivision defendant pleaded, it cannot be determined from the plea whether defendant acted negligently or intentionally. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — Summary Judgment.) [1044]*1044Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D.2d 1043, 595 N.Y.S.2d 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-papavram-nyappdiv-1993.