Keller v. Mitchell
This text of 1 White & W. 40 (Keller v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 97. Stockholders in an irregular corporation; liability of. A person who made a contract with an organization which had attempted irregularly to create itself into a corporation, and which acted as such, or who subscribed to its capital- stock, cannot, in a suit by the corporation, defend himself against a claim growing out of such contract or subscription, by alleging the irregularity of such organization. And one who receives a certificate of stock for-a certain number of shares at a given sum per share, thereby becomes liable to pay the amount thereof when called upon by the corporation or its assignee. Nor is it necessary to sustain the action, in such case, that there should have been a subscription for the whole amount [41]*41named in the articles of incorporation. [Chubb v. Upton, 5 Otto, 665; Plank Road Co. v. Wetsel, 21 Barb. (N. Y.) 56.]
Reversed and rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 White & W. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-mitchell-texapp-1881.