Keller v. Manhattan Elevated Railway Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Keller v. Manhattan Elevated Railway Co.

39 N.Y. St. Rep. 143

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 11, 1891·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—The fair construction of the findings and conclusions that are argued to be inconsistent is that although the plaintiff lost none of the rents under the lease of No. 662 expiring in 1890, yet that the rental value had been diminished. That the plaintiff could recover for such a diminution has been determined in this court against the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Ingraham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

—The fair construction of the findings and conclusions that are argued to be inconsistent is that although the plaintiff lost none of the rents under the lease of No. 662 expiring in 1890, yet that the rental value had been diminished. That the plaintiff could recover for such a diminution has been determined in this court against the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Ingraham, J., concur.

Keller v. Manhattan Elevated Railway Co., 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

39 N.Y. St. Rep. 143 (Keller v. Manhattan Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.