Keller v. Loyless

205 F. 510, 123 C.C.A. 578, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1476
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 12, 1913·No. No. 220·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] As the articles complained of are not libelous per se, and as a demand to recover special damages for defamatory words not libelous per se is not sufficiently set forth, the complaint was properly dismissed. Judge Mayer’s opinion fully covers the subject.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keller v. Loyless, 205 F. 510, 123 C.C.A. 578, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1476 (2d Cir. 1913).

205 F. 510 (Keller v. Loyless) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorney v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n
149 F. Supp. 615 (D. New Jersey, 1957)
Berg v. Printers' Ink Pub. Co.
54 F. Supp. 795 (S.D. New York, 1943)