Keller v. Holderman
This text of 11 Mich. 248 (Keller v. Holderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When the Court below found as a fact that “the whole transaction between the ■ parties was a frolic and a banter, the plaintiff not expecting to sell, nor the defendant intending to buy the watch at' the sum for which the check was drawn,” the conclusion should have been that no contract was ever made by the parties, and the finding should have been that no cause of action existed upon the-check to the plaintiff'.
The judgment is reversed, with costs of this .Court and of the Court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Mich. 248, 1863 Mich. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-holderman-mich-1863.