Keller v. Holderman
11 Mich. 248, 1863 Mich. LEXIS 20
Opinion
When the Court below found as a fact that “the whole transaction between the ■ parties was a frolic and a banter, the plaintiff not expecting to sell, nor the defendant intending to buy the watch at' the sum for which the check was drawn,” the conclusion should have been that no contract was ever made by the parties, and the finding should have been that no cause of action existed upon the-check to the plaintiff'.
The judgment is reversed, with costs of this .Court and of the Court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keller v. Holderman, 11 Mich. 248, 1863 Mich. LEXIS 20 (Mich. 1863).
11 Mich. 248 (Keller v. Holderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harwood v. Randolph Harwood, Inc
333 N.W.2d 609 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
Kilpatrick Brothers, Inc., Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Appellee-Cross-Appellant
464 F.2d 1080 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
Mitzel v. Hauck
105 N.W.2d 378 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1960)
Ryan v. Schott
159 N.E.2d 907 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1959)
Weinstein v. Newman
101 N.E.2d 772 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1951)
Zell v. American Seating Co.
138 F.2d 641 (Second Circuit, 1943)
Woods v. Fifth-Third Union Tr. Co.
6 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1936)
In Re H. Hicks & Son
82 F.2d 277 (Second Circuit, 1936)
Godoy v. George Alexander & Sons, Inc.
82 F.2d 277 (Second Circuit, 1936)
Chiles v. Good
41 S.W.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport Corporation
34 F.2d 655 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Woods v. Ayres
39 Mich. 345 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)