Keller v. Finkelstein
This text of 274 A.D. 890 (Keller v. Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In October, 1947, respondent contracted to purchase a two-family house in Brooklyn and shortly thereafter made application to the temporary city housing rent commission for a certificate to evict the tenant in the lower floor apartment. Although compelling necessity for possession of the dwelling accommodations was shown, the commission refused to issue the certificate because of failure to show good faith, respondent having permitted one of the co-owners who sold the property to him to remain in possession under a lease given by him, as part of the transaction, in consideration of a reduction in the purchase price. Respondent then instituted a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the commission. Special Term annulled the determination and directed the certificate to issue. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition dismissed, without costs. There is no basis for a finding that the action of the commission was capricious, arbitrary or unreasonable, and the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the commission. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 890, 82 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-finkelstein-nyappdiv-1948.