Keller v. Denmead & Son

68 Pa. 449, 1871 Pa. LEXIS 228
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 9, 1871·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

We see not wherein anything more is necessary to be said in this case than what has been so well said by the learned judge below in his opinion on the reserved points in the case. The lien of the mechanic was perfectly given by statute, at the time the defendant was declared a bankrupt, although not entered, and it continued so afterwards by being entered on the records of the court, which was within the prescribed period of six months from the commencement of the building and materials furnished. That there is a saving of liens in the Bankrupt Act is apparent in several sections. Sections 27 and 42 imply this so distinctly as not to permit it to be doubted. See notes to these sections, Bright. Dig. of Bankrupt Law, pp. 39 and 47. This court has decided within a year (Biddle’s Appeal, antea, p. 13

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keller v. Denmead & Son, 68 Pa. 449, 1871 Pa. LEXIS 228 (Pa. 1871).

68 Pa. 449 (Keller v. Denmead & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dente v. Bullis
76 A.2d 158 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
A. D. Rossi, Inc. v. Drew
4 Pa. D. & C.2d 589 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1954)
Hamilton v. LeSueur
46 Pa. D. & C. 516 (Erie County Court Common Pleas, 1942)
Womer v. Gearhart
16 Pa. D. & C. 359 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
O'Kane v. Murray
97 A. 94 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Fairlamb v. Smedley Construction Co.
36 Pa. Super. 17 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Weaver v. Sheeler
12 A. 558 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)