Keller v. Davidson

378 F. Supp. 2d 1289, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20882, 2004 WL 2359556
District Court, D. Colorado·Decided October 15, 2004·No. Civ.A.03-Z-1482(CBS)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

WEINSHIENK, Senior District Judge.

On January 23, 2004, we entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying the Colorado General Assembly and Governor Owens’ Motion to File Amended Counterclaims and staying these proceedings until the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling in People ex rel. Salazar v. Davidson, 79 P.3d 1221 (Colo.2003) became final. In a Memorandum Opinion and Order we also stated that “[i]f the Salazar opinion becomes final in its current version, we will then dismiss the federal claims on the basis of issue preclusion and we will dismiss the pendant state claims as moot.” Keller v. Davidson, 299 F.Supp.2d 1171, 1183 (D.Colo.2004).

The General Assembly’s petition for cer-tiorari from the United States Supreme Court was denied on June 7, 2004, and the 25-day period in which to file a petition for rehearing from the Supreme Court has now lapsed. See Sup.Ct. R. 44(2). The Colorado court’s decision in Salazar v. Davidson is therefore now final. Accordingly, we hereby

GRANT Davidson’s motion for substitution of counsel, DISMISS the Defendants’ counterclaims as barred by issue preclusion, and DISMISS Plaintiffs’ claims, and DENY any outstanding motions in this case, as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keller v. Davidson, 378 F. Supp. 2d 1289, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20882, 2004 WL 2359556 (D. Colo. 2004).

378 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (Keller v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lance v. Davidson
379 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Colorado, 2005)