Keller v. Boatman
Opinion
—This suit was brought by the appellee against fifteen defendants, all of whom remained in the case [278] to its final conclusion, and against all of whom a money judgment or a decree was rendered.
Two of the defendants, Keller and Small, prayed for an appeal, and have assigned errors. After their assignment of error is the following endorsement on the transcript: “Joinder in appeal. The defendant below, Sarah H. Keller, appeals, and says the court below erred in rendering the decree of foreclosure against her without proof, she being the-wife of appellant, Robert H. Keller. And- she prays a reversal.”
There was no such party in the case as Sarah H. Keller, nor did such party or person take exception or ask an appeal.
Only a part of co-defendants, against whom a-judgment or decree was rendered, having appealed, and not having complied with sec. 551, 2 G. & IT. 270, following numerous and uniform rulings of this- court, the appeal must be dismissed.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
41 Ind. 277 (Keller v. Boatman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.